Reads: Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?

Do androids dream of electric sleep book cover

The book authored by Phillip K Dick is also known as “Bladerunner”, after the movie based on the book was released in the 80s.

This isn’t my first read of the book, nor will it likely be my last. I’ve read it probably five times over the years, maybe more — always with long spells between each reading. And each time, I see something different, something new, in the story that I hadn’t picked up on previously. You’d think after so many reads, I’d have it mostly figured out in a relatively short book. Some of my thinking is influenced by current events surrounding cult of personalities (Mercerism, Buster Friendly), nuclear war without a known instigator, the rise of artificial intelligence (Nexus 6 androids) and, interestingly, the idea of empathy as something that needs to be reenforced and treated as a commodity.

It is fascinating to me today, in a way that wasn’t interesting to me a decade ago, the idea that empathy is something that can be a requirement or expectation for humans to artificially participate in. That people can “dial in their moods”, might be required to dial in a mood, contrasted against the androids’ lack of empathy begs the question: which life-form is actually superior. Keep in mind, the androids in “Bladerunner” are technically biological, but not considered “living”. This subject is ripe for discussion.

The other element that didn’t mean much to me in earlier reads of the book is discovery of a toad, which turns out to be an artificial toad, but that Deckard initially thinks is a living remnant of a species that is thought to be extinct.

And there are questions about Rachel’s nature that I have after this read that I didn’t have previously. Perhaps I am older, nominally wiser, but I feel there are unanswered questions surrounding her role in the book (and movie).

After this read, I am left with more questions than ever before and I find myself tempted to read it right away again to see fi I can glean answers for those questions.

And, perhaps, I may.

If you haven’t read the book, I can’t recommend it enough. It is oddly topical in today’s world — many of the ideas written about decades ago as fiction are coming up as potential concerns in our current era. While some elements have a dated feel, the overall story stands the test of time, in my opinion.


6 responses to “Reads: Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?”

  1. Ted Wallenius Avatar

    Do you think the ambiguity about Rachel is what transferred into the movie? There’s a lot of theories about her-does she live? Die? Is Deckard human or artificial? I guess the main question in the movie could be did the androids get better and better, until they found the ability to have empathy, to love, to become human? And when did that happen-while we’re watching or a long time before? Are we all just robots? There’s like fifty different endings of the thing now and, like Roger Ebert said, it doesn’t matter which one you like best-they’re all awesome.

    1. michael raven Avatar

      In the book, Rachel is decidedly Nexus 6 and lives — Deckard goes back to his life without her.

      I think the book questions how we delineate the differences between android and human. If you need to “dial in” your emotion to feel empathy for others with the same emotion, are you really any better than an android in which the empathy instrument doesn’t work? If the nominal reason that we kill androids is that they don’t have empathy, why are the humans spared? And the androids certainly have empathy for each other in both the book and movie.

      There is more closure in the book, but I love the ambiguity of the movie(s). I’m still a bit of a sucker for the original theatrical, with Deckard’s corny noir voiceovers.

      1. shredbobted Avatar

        Me too. Yeah, I think that might be the point-at a certain level of sophistication, is there any difference between human and not? Esp. when one is better at being human, even if it’s not the one you’d think.

        1. michael raven Avatar

          Pris gives away the game with a spider in the book, horrifying JS (Isadore in the book, Sebastian in the movie) by doing the thing young kids do with bugs, cutting off legs to see if it still walk. The fact that JS is “special” and a “chickenhead” in the book shows that, while he can empathize with the androids due to his status, he actually might have more empathy than them OR the “normals” like Deckard.

          There is a lot to unpack if anyone wanted to take the time.

          1. shredbobted Avatar

            That’s what makes for great literature. Timelessness. Coincidence. Truth.

            1. michael raven Avatar

              One day I might actually write some great literature. Right after the monkeys let me have one of their typewriters when they are finished.

Leave a comment. Markdown use is permitted.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.