Half-penny Thoughts — 09mar25

Photo by Bharath Kumar on Unsplash

As I delving back into the habit of writing prose versus my habit in recent years of writing almost exclusively poetry, I’m tossing around several ideas to bounce around my largely empty cranium.

Okay, it’s more like dumping a large bucket of superballs at this time.

Or, if I’m more upfront and honest about what I’m doing, throwing the whole bunch of superballs all at once as hard as I can and see what comes out of the bouncy mess.

While Sunny Day Parasol Co. is taking up most of my creative energy at the moment, I am working on several conceptual ideas in the background for consideration as I look to the future. Unless something changes in the meantime, a return to writing regular, episodic/serialized fiction is likely in the cards for me.

Why? Because I’m enjoying the process and I’ve thought since the early 00s that the serial is the best approach to fiction-writing in the age of the internet when presented on the internet (which is not necessarily true when fiction is presented in physical formats).

I’ve also been thinking hard about audience as well, recognizing that not everyone likes a mixture of fiction, poetry, random ponders disguised as thinks, and the occasional bit song. In my experience and by and large, fiction folks like fiction and poetry folks like poetry. Music and Ponders can tolerated as long as they don’t completely disrupt the flow of the first two buckets. At least, that is the sense I get when reading between the lines in the comments over my 20+ years writing blogs.

As I consider forking my prose off to another domain, largely to improve readability considerations — which are different than blogging or short-form writing — I thought I’d ask folks to pipe in and tell me what you think about my impressions of readers’ habits. While I know that some of you have one foot on the sidewalk and the other in the gutter (I’ll let you frame which is which in this analogy), I have gathered that most folks prefer to keep both feet on the same surface. I’m not talking specific to this site or my writing, I speaking in more generalized terms across the online options out there.

Do I have a bad misread on the situation? Am I seeing divisions that do not exist? Or am I spot on? i.e., “Michael, I really prefer to read [fill in the blank] exclusively, if given the choice.”

If you had an ideal presentation of either prose or poetry (or a blend), how do you think it would be best presented that is maybe not meeting your ideals? Is there a site I should look at that you think does it the best? Or do you think finding the right kind of presentation is a unicorn of sorts? Or am I bouncing too many superballs?

How important is it to be able to have a conversation with the writer of fiction on a per-post basis in the comments? Or do you find most comments are “feel good comments” and not really conversational? How important is keeping track of conversations to you: critical to engagement, a nice thing to have, or meh?

Lots of questions. I am more interested in generalized responses rather than opinions about my many possible intentions.


22 responses to “Half-penny Thoughts — 09mar25”

  1. Tansy Gunnar Avatar

    No answers for ya. But… yours and Jolene’s long fiction has inspired me to add some meat to old bones.

    1. michael raven Avatar

      But the key question I’m asking is:

      If telescopes use mirrors, how do we know there are no space vampires?

  2. missparker0106 Avatar

    An answer to one of the many questions: prose.

    As far as comments go–yes, many are generally feel-good. As a comment writer, I adhere to the rule: If you don’t have anything good to say, don’t say anything at all. I’m not saying I believe this is why many comments on many blogs are of the “feel good” variety, but mine are.

    So, completely out of character, I’ll be frank: I’m not a fan of the “buffet style” blog. I generally subscribe for a particular subject (prose, autobiographical stories, genre-specific music, photography) and end up picking and choosing the posts I read from blogs that explore multiple genres. Again, it may just be a personal idiosyncrasy, and not indicative of the general population. It will also not deter me from being a subscriber here as I feel connected with the writer because of our mutual disconnect from the world. 🙂

    1. michael raven Avatar

      Thank you 😊

      Ahh, what I call the Thumper rule (Bambi reference). Similar, although I will bend it if I’m allowed to be frank.

      I don’t think you’re the exception in this case. I think when people want Chinese take out, they go get Chinese take out; if they want a greasy spoon, they don’t go to Old Country Buffet.

      And therein is the conundrum. I’m a bit eclectic, but I perceive people prefer consistency and a single focus when they visit a site.

      Thanks for putting up with the variety show here 😊 I do appreciate it when you visit because of that connection we share.

      Thanks again. 💙

  3. Bob Avatar

    I like that you bounce between prose and poetry. I think that’s fun, and I would like to do more of that myself. I don’t have much thoughts on presentation. Just easy to access.

    1. michael raven Avatar

      Thanks! I appreciate the insights. It could very well be that my impressions are incorrect about a general audience, which is why I ask.

      Presentation is one of those things that I think we have a certain level of “accepted wisdom” about, but I think can be challenged occasionally to make sure they still hold true.

      Thanks!

      1. Bob Avatar

        You’re most welcome!

  4. Veselin Avatar

    The audience will adjust.

    1. michael raven Avatar

      There is that possibility as well, certainly.

  5. lodestarwytch Avatar

    I like that you bounce everything around the same blog – but my brain is a rollar coaster spaghetti junction with a glitter ball and somewhere there’s a tumbleweed disguised as a ball of yarn…😅

    1. michael raven Avatar

      Wonderful image there. 😂

      Thanks for the thoughts on the matter. My mind tends to go all over the place and I am pretty eclectic in my interests (ergo, the lack of consistency on this site). The conventional wisdom elsewhere is that people prefer consistency: If they are ordering Chinese take-out they don’t want to open the box to find Italian. When they go to a poetry site, they want poetry… not some disturbed individual’s pointless rambles or serialized fiction.

      But some of us do not fit in with that conventional wisdom, right?

      Thanks again for the food for thought. I trust y’all’s opinions and thoughts more than I trust conventional wisdom.

  6. lyndhurstlaura Avatar

    I mix things up on my own blog, so I don’t have a problem with others doing likewise. I read more for the person doing the writing, because I like their style, their take on life, whatever. If I wanted a site devoted exclusively to poetry/prose/drama/whatever then I’m sure I could find one. Having said that, I have a problem with long posts, purely because I don’t have the time to sit and read them. I know that might sound rather shallow, but it is what it is. Do whatever takes your fancy, my friend, and I’ll read it if I have the time. 🙂

    1. michael raven Avatar

      Maybe I’m working off of some outdated “conventional wisdom”. It seems like it was a free-for-all back during the LiveJournal and early Blogger days, focuses seemed to narrow around 2010. Last I looked into the matter back about 2022, the “experts” were saying “consistency matters!”.

      I guess I’m consistently inconsistent. shrug

      Maybe THAT’S the ticket. 😂

      1. lyndhurstlaura Avatar

        The ‘conventional wisdom’ sounds like that which claims authors shouldn’t be multi-genre, because it ‘confuses readers’. I’m not one of those ‘machines’ that churns out the same sort of thing ad infinitum, writing to a formula. Good luck to them, of course, butvI write what comes to me, which varies. Consistently inconsistent works for me, along with others I know. Do your own thing, refuse to be consigned to one particular box. It’s what makes you uniquely you. 🙂

        1. michael raven Avatar

          I doubt that I am able to change myself after this long, but it is interesting to see if there is truth to some of the design philosophies or if it might be hogwash. My sample size is far too small, and my approach is unscientific. However, I’m discovering that there might be a strong element of hogwash to the so-called wisdom.

          Thanks for the thoughts. 😊

          1. lyndhurstlaura Avatar

            I never chose wisdom. Make of that what you will … 😂

          2. michael raven Avatar

            Who? Me? Surprised?

            😂

  7. sopantooth Avatar

    FWIW X years ago I had separate blogs for separate things and the effect for me was I went from 1 blog with a couple readers to 4 blogs with zero readers. I figured if I split things up people could find and follow the one that was interesting to them but instead it seemed to make everything harder to find. Then again I had very few readers to begin with so grain of salt.

    1. michael raven Avatar

      Thanks! It’s actually very valuable information to have.

      I’ve struggled with accepting that we need to split our personalities to satisfy readers. The only real reason I can think of it to use a heavily modified WP theme that supports online novels and serials (greatly improving the reading experience), but is the death knell for Jetpack/WordPress Reader integration. Nor is it very intuitive to manage on the backend. But it looked fantastic when I demo’d it on a subdomain.

      But I suspect you are right about splitting readers. It could backfire bigly.

      Thanks again.

Leave a comment. Markdown use is permitted.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.