Thoughts on rewilding — 10 apr 25

a path in the middle of a dark forest
Photo by Wes Hicks on Unsplash

It often feels pretentious to talk about my thoughts around my path towards rewilding. I mean, who do I think I am to turn away from the norms and follow the trail deeper into the woods?

It is also difficult to do so because I have rejected most of the labels people use.

I do not consider myself a pagan, wiccan, heathen or druid. Yes, I view the equinoxes and solstices as important cornerstones in my thinking and, yes, I have practiced with many of these communities, but am less apt to embrace the agricultural-based holidays beyond what has been called Samhain. Even then, I see that autumnal evening more as a period of intense liminality rather than a holy or spiritual day. Beyond those five periods, we have little in common. I don’t worship gods, I don’t do rituals, I no longer entangle myself with concepts of magic(k), however defined. I reject most of the New Age elements many groups have adopted since the 1970s, many of which are modern invention that have little to do with the supposed sources they are attributed to.

My practices are not those a shaman would follow, but they have shamanic truths that guide them. I think a shaman has a specific role to play in their respective culture and I do not have that role as my calling. Therefore, I am not a shaman and would never dream of calling myself one — that would be the community served by a shaman to determine if one of their members should be called that, it is not the aspiring shaman’s decision to name themselves thusly. I have recently started considering a self-named shaman to possibly not be what they claim to be.

What I do embrace is spirits; of people, animals (another kind of people), plants, earth, the elements, of everything really. Do I beseech them for favors? Give up prayers to them?

No.

But some of them do guide me as best as they are able, considering my slow wit and low intelligence. They’ve adopted me, if that makes sense, and they try to show me things that I have been blind to. I send my thanks, but I don’t consider that to really be prayer any more than I would consider thanking someone who lent me a hand in my education. I honor them, but that is not the same as worship or prayer, and I never ask for special favors, however tempting it might be.

I might be an animist, but that carries baggage with it too, by virtue of colonialist academic thinking. I’m not sure that everything that extra luggage entails is appropriate for defining my practices and beliefs.

So what is rewilding to me? Getting in touch with both true self as well and further exploring the old ways of approaching spirits in the way our hunter-gatherer forebears approached spirits. For me, that is the calling, a minimalist engagement with spirit as it is, instead of how we define it to be.

Does any of this even make sense?

I don’t know. I wonder if trying to put this into words is the wisest thing I have ever done, but I feel compelled to try at least. I’ll quite possibly learning to regret having tried to ride this tiger.


13 responses to “Thoughts on rewilding — 10 apr 25”

  1. flytheraven Avatar

    It’s like, when we were kids-we didn’t have to fit a box. We could just explore and hold truths. That’s what I see in your words-traveling back through all you’ve learned to what is truly you. It’s beautiful.

    1. michael raven Avatar

      It’s a bit like that, I suppose. As things seem to get ever more complex, I am trying to simplify and get to the heart of the matter — not add more layers between myself and the essence. Carve away that which interferes… IDK

      Thank you for the kind words. 🙏🏼 🐦‍⬛

      1. flytheraven Avatar

        It sounds like you do know. It sounds solid to me and practicle.

  2. Bob Avatar

    Rewilding sounds like an engaging response to me. I don’t have much of a formal approach to any of this, but connecting to the larger world through spirits sounds engaging to me.

    1. michael raven Avatar

      In some ways, I wonder if the formal approach is more of a hindrance than a help — but that could also just be me. There are plenty of people out there who benefit from a more standardized thought process or approach. Me? I think I’m trying to get away from all of that. It just gets in the way and keeps me from “touching” the source.

      1. Bob Avatar

        I’m not much of a formalist myself. And like you, it sometimes feels that gets in the way, like you say, “touching the source.”

  3. lodestarwytch Avatar

    As Dr Seuss said “Today you are You, that is truer than true. There is no one alive who is Youer than You” 😊

  4. chrisnelson61 Avatar

    I think that writing it down helps clarify not so much your own path as the paths you don’t want to take or those you reject.
    Definitions can be tricky – certainly anything dogmatic or rigid is a no-no from my point of view – but they are how the human world views things, so I understand the issues many might have.
    I mentioned before about living things (imo) leaving behind energies (call them ‘spirits’ if you will), and perhaps it is these that we wish or need to connect with. Respect is another key area I think, particularly in relation to Nature, that needs to be rediscovered – but I’m not pushing any beliefs or agenda here.
    The ‘right’ way will open up.

    1. michael raven Avatar

      Yes, it is easier to define via what “it is not” in this case. Dogma is on a quick path leading away from my understandings, and may be the source of my discontent with other paths that I have tried. Every one seems to want to catalog and put things into their appropriate trays to file away. And nearly every approach seems to want to min/max (to borrow from game theory) the process for maximum personal “enlightenment”. Or less lofty and more earthly goals…

      Whereas my approach has been more about empathizing with the world around me (obviously, not just the people of the world, but everything from foxes to big stones on a river bank). And learning how to think outside of our western logic systems — useful for min/maxing, but not so useful for deeply understanding, because western logic does not work for quite a few things.

      I think when you start to call something a “belief”, you’ve likely already strayed. It means that you are applying logic to the unknown or the unknowable to infer something about that unknown.

      It may sound odd coming from someone who makes his living as a scientist, but that is one of the biggest pitfalls of science as it is practiced: a confusion between hypothesis and reality.

      But…That’s another dead horse for me to beat. 🙂

      1. chrisnelson61 Avatar

        I think it’s a real positive being able to think and work within the confines of the sciences and yet still be open to that which cannot be explained using logic and rigid parameters.
        Labels are, in a way, a form of control, and veer from the understanding that we experience through feeling it, and, as we all feel things in our own personal way, are unable to rationalise.
        Perhaps finding one’s own way is a step too far for some?

        1. michael raven Avatar

          My brain used to be more limber (age, recovering alcoholic), but I find myself leaning ever more towards the less logical processes over reasoned thinking. Part of that was influenced by Zen and Taoism. Part of that is influenced by experiential exploration.

          It is definitely a step too far for some people. And yet, it feels like the correct path.

          I’m finding labels to be oppressive in recent years. Never much cared for them to begin with, but find them obnoxious now where they were mere annoyances before.

          Thanks for the banter. 🙏🏼

Leave a comment. Markdown use is permitted.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.